Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Prenat Diagn ; 37(2): 168-175, 2017 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27981591

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prenatal ultrasound parameters as prognostic factors for complex and vanishing gastroschisis. METHODS: Retrospective multicentre study of 200 gastroschisis over 13 years (2000-2013). Collection of prenatal ultrasound evaluation on maternal and fetal growth parameters, intra- and extra-abdominal bowel and stomach dilation, abdominal wall defect diameter and changes in bowel appearance. Correlation of these factors with the presence of mechanical intestinal complications at birth, named 'complex gastroschisis'. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients (26%) had complex gastroschisis (CG), including ten vanishing gastroschisis. The presence of intra-abdominal bowel dilation at the second (T2) or third (T3) trimester ultrasound was predictive for CG, with odds ratios at 6.69 (95%CI 2.41-18.55) and 4.72 (95%CI 2.16-10.28), respectively, with a cut-off value at the last examination of >19 mm. A small abdominal wall defect diameter was also predictive for CG, with cut-off values of <9.2 mm at T2 and <12.5 mm at T3. Vanishing gastroschisis recorded earlier intra-abdominal bowel dilation diagnosis, associated with a small wall defect and no extra-abdominal dilation. CONCLUSION: Intra-abdominal bowel dilation and a small abdominal wall defect diameter accurately predict CG and could be a first sign of vanishing gastroschisis when they occur early. © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Gastrosquisis/diagnóstico , Gastrosquisis/patología , Ultrasonografía Prenatal , Abdomen/diagnóstico por imagen , Abdomen/patología , Adulto , Dilatación Patológica , Femenino , Desarrollo Fetal , Gastrosquisis/epidemiología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Intestinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Intestinos/patología , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Remisión Espontánea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ultrasonografía Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
2.
Can J Urol ; 21(1): 7120-4, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24529012

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ureteral stent placement is a key urologic procedure used to manage ureteral obstructions. It is usually performed under general anesthesia (GA) with its inherent risks. The objective was to evaluate safety, feasibility and tolerance of ureteral stent placement under local anesthesia (LA) in women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2013, we prospectively and consecutively reviewed all female patients who had an urgent retrograde ureteral stent placement under LA. Only primary stent placements were included in the study. Pain was assessed after surgery by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and pain and comfort assessment during stent placement were reported. We compared outcomes and tolerance with patients under general anesthesia (GA) matched by age and operatives indications during the same period. RESULTS: We included 36 patients (18 under LA and 18 under GA) with a mean age of 59.4 +/- 22.4 years. The mean operative time was 24.4 +/- 12.9 min and 18.8 +/- 6.5 min in LA group and GA group (p = 0.110), respectively. One patient needed GA due to a poor tolerance. The mean perioperative VAS scores under LA and GA were 5.89 +/-2.95 and 2.06 +/- 2.67 (p < 0.0001), respectively. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. The procedure was painful for 16 (88.8%) patients from the LA group and 9 (50%) patients would not accept to undergo this intervention under LA again. CONCLUSION: Ureteral stent placement under LA in women can be performed safely and effectively. However, this procedure is painful and should be proposed only to selected cases.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local , Dolor/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Stents , Obstrucción Ureteral/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anestesia Local/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Stents/efectos adversos
3.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 30(3): 305-11, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24337654

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of an Alexis wound retractor (AWR) device for staged gastroschisis closures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: AWR device was used to cover unreduced viscera of a gastroschisis when primary abdominal wall closure was not convenient. The eviscerated organs were covered with one of the two spring-loaded rings of the AWR inserted underneath the abdominal wall. Gradual reduction was guaranteed through careful traction on the external ring. We retrospectively analyzed the prenatal, post-natal and operative data of the first patients treated with AWR and report their post-operative outcomes. RESULTS: The AWR device was used for staged closure in eight cases. Complete reduction and fascial closure were performed at a median of 3.5 ± 1.6 days. Ventilatory support was necessary for 4.0 ± 3 days and full parenteral feeds for 7.5 ± 6.1 days after fascial closure. Median full enteral feeding was observed at 18 ± 12.5 days after closure allowing discharge in a median period of 30.5 ± 15.6 days after closure. CONCLUSION: The AWR device is not only a safe and efficient silo for a progressive reduction of severe gastroschisis, but also an interesting tool for continuous stretching leading to an increase of the peritoneal cavity volume, enhancing the equalizing of the viscero-abdominal disproportion.


Asunto(s)
Gastrosquisis/cirugía , Prótesis e Implantes , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...